Derek wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:35:54 GMT, Jonathan Ball > wrote:
>
>>Derek wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 15:46:43 GMT, Jonathan Ball > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message ink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>At the very start of this thread Jon offered a syllogism
>>>>>>>in the form
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1) If I eat meat, I cause harm to animals
>>>>>>>2) I do not eat meat;
>>>>>>>Therefore,
>>>>>>>3)I do not cause harm to animals.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It has two premisses and a conclusion. It's also commits
>>>>>>>a fallacy, since the second premiss denies the antecedent
>>>>>>>in the first premiss.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It certainly does! ALL "vegans" commit this fallacy,
>>>>>>including you.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ipse dixit and false.
>>>>
>>>>No, well established, documented and true.
>>>
>>>The two examples you brought here are PERFECTLY
>>>representative of ALL vegans
>>
>>I know.
>
>
> I didn't write that sentence you responded to. You
> unethically re-worded my sentence

No, there was nothing unethical about it. I did it not
because I am unethical, but because you are a worthless
piece of shit, and I don't have the minimal respect for
you necessary to engage you in genuine discussion. I
did it to shit on your head, Dreck. You put yourself
in this position. You never participated honestly
here, and I finally became sick of you and your
clownish antics.

You simply do not deserve even basic decency from
others. You have worked hard to become an object of
scorn and contempt, and you have succeeded.