Dreck Nash, stupid liar, lied:

> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message ink.net...
>
>>Dreck Nash, stupid liar, lied:
>
> [..]
>
>>>At the very start of this thread Jon offered a syllogism
>>>in the form
>>>
>>>1) If I eat meat, I cause harm to animals
>>>2) I do not eat meat;
>>>Therefore,
>>>3)I do not cause harm to animals.
>>>
>>>It has two premisses and a conclusion. It's also commits
>>>a fallacy, since the second premiss denies the antecedent
>>>in the first premiss.
>>
>>It certainly does! ALL "vegans" commit this fallacy,
>>including you.
>
>
> Ipse dixit and false.

No, well established, documented and true.

>
>>>>>Secondly, my task is then to show that HIS argument
>>>>>is not the argument put forward by vegans.
>>
>>And you FAIL
>
>
> It might be put forward by a few

No, ALL:

>>
>> Go Vegan and live cruelty free. Peace is only found
>> with how we live our lives...not through some
>> external belief in spirituality. Treat all animals
>> the way you would want to be treated. Vegans may be
>> smaller, but we are far more healthy on average.
>> http://tinyurl.com/7gvl
>
>
> What part of that statement implies animals aren't
> killed during crop production

"cruelty free".

>
>
>> The vegan lives a death free lifestyle, and your
>> useless efforts to queer this fact by pointing your
>> finger at us for the deaths caused by the farmer
>> isn't fooling anyone.
>> http://tinyurl.com/7gw1
>
>
> Again, what part in that statement implies deaths
> aren't caused by the hands of others


"death free"


Both of the examples are by ****WITS who believe that
merely by not consuming animal parts, the two ****WITS
aren't causing cruelty and death. QED