"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
k.net...
> JethroUK© wrote:
>
> > "Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
> > k.net...
> >
> >>JethroUK© wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>the semi-literate JethroUK© scrawled:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>JethroUK© wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>It is not important to any animal, a priori, that it
> >>>>>>>>"gets to exist".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>yes it is
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>No, it isn't. I've explained in plain English why it
> >>>>>>cannot be. I suppose English is not your native tongue.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>yes it is
> >>>>
> >>>>It doesn't appear to be. I don't think you could
> >>>>express coherent thoughts in any language.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>you mean you've 'read' somewhere that it isn't
> >>
> >>No, I am merely going by your severely impaired
> >>articulation in English. It would appear that English
> >>is not your native tongue. It doesn't merely appear,
> >>it is a FACT that you are an uneducated twit who has no
> >>business whatever trying to discuss philosophy. Your
> >>opinions are ignornant and uninformed. No matter what
> >>your native tongue, you cannot express coherent thoughts.
> >>
> >
> >
> > say you
>
> Correctly, and with much support.
>

i eat - therfor i breed cows - everyones is 'better' off for it