"Wilson Woods" > wrote in message
news
> JethroUK© wrote:
>
> >>"animal kind" does not have interests; only individual
> >>entities have interests.
> >
> >
> > depends how you [choose] to use the word 'interest'
>
> No, it doesn't, Mr Semantic-Game-Playing ****tard. The
> word "interest" in ethics is very well defined and
> understood, and not susceptible to your
> definition-fiddling.
>
>
> > it is in the best interest of animal kind
>
> No. Only individuals have interests. You lose, right
> off the line.
>

it is in the best interest of animal kind and the world as a whole