"John Coleman" > wrote in message
...
> > Ipse dixit. BTW, are you immortal?
>
> this thread is about health and illness, not mortality
>
> > Post hoc fallacy.
>
> no a result confirmed by many raw foodists and documented by Ehret -
science
> is about theories that can be confirmed by observation
>
> > Taking vitamin pills to make up for your dietary deficiencies is NOT
> natural.
>
> the biochemistry cares not one hoot if the B12 is from a pill or a bug or
a
> piece of faeces - it is all B12,
======================
That wasn't the point. If you consider it unnatural for man to kill and eat
meat, then it's far more unnatural to pump oil out of the ground, ship it
around the world enhancing the profits of the petro-chemical industry, so
that the pharmaceutical industry then can make big batches of pills and
containers to then re-ship around the world. It's not the B12 in question,
it's the processes whereby you get enough of it. The 'vegan' process of
getting b12 is not natural.



and our nature requires that stuff -
> however B12 from a stack of meat isn't healthy
> ========================
But wait, b12 is b12 is b12. How can the b12 from meat be unhealthy?
Now, make up your mind, either all b12 is the same, or somehow some of it
isn't.


> John
>
>