> wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:43:24 GMT, Wilson Woods >
wrote:
>
> >JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and
> >legitimate questions.
> >
> >Jethro wrote,
> >
> > "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
> > raise it at all?"
> >
> > "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
> > animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> > at all?"
> >
> > "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
> > animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
> > at all?"
> >
> >He has been asked REPEATEDLY and civilly:
> >"better"/"more moral" for whom or what?
>
> I've asked you "ARAs" more than once for whom or what it would
> be better not to raise animals to eat. So far all we know is that it would
> be better for people who are disturbed because humans eat meat, and
> that's probably about the end of it. One thing we know for sure is that
> it wouldn't be better for animals...we do know that Gonad.
>
> >Why does JethroUK the coward keep EVADING the question?
> >JethroUK the coward also has been asked, repeatedly and
> >civilly, why he thinks it is important to draw
> >attention to the unimportant "fact" that animals "get
> >to live" only because they are bred to be eaten.
>
> Probably because billions of them get to live only because they are
> bred to be eaten. Why do you "think" it's important for that very
significant
> fact to be disregarded? We know why, because it suggests that the
elimination
> of animals raised for food might not be the most ethical course to take.
>
> >He
> >keeps whiffing off and EVADING that question, as well.
> >
> >Answer the questions, JethroUK the coward:
> >
> >1. Why do you think your little "fact" merits any
> >attention
> > at all?
>
> Because you "ARAs" want people to consider their deaths, but you are
terrified
> if they also consider their lives. You are terrified that people might
consider an
> ethically equivalent or superior alternative to your elimination
objective.
>
> Why do you think your little fact that the elimination of farm animals
would
> not harm farm animals merits a LOT! of attention, but the fact that
billions of
> them live because we raise them merits none?

Animals are put on earth to flavor barbecue sauce and pasta.