Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and goodquestions?
Pale in Wales wrote:
>>Jethro wrote,
>>
>> "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
>> raise it at all?"
>>
>> "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
>> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
>> at all?"
>>
>> "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
>> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
>> at all?"
>>
>>He has been asked REPEATEDLY and civilly:
>>"better"/"more moral" for whom or what?
>>
>>Why does JethroUK the coward keep EVADING the question?
>>
>>
>>JethroUK the coward also has been asked, repeatedly and
>>civilly, why he thinks it is important to draw
>>attention to the unimportant "fact" that animals "get
>>to live" only because they are bred to be eaten. He
>>keeps whiffing off and EVADING that question, as well.
>>
>>Answer the questions, JethroUK the coward:
>>
>>1. Why do you think your little "fact" merits any
>>attention
>> at all?
>>
>>2. For whom or what might it be "better"/"more moral"
>> in your earlier questions,
>>
>> "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
>> raise it at all?"
>>
>> "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
>> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
>> at all?"
>>
>> "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
>> animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
>> at all?"
>>
>>
>>Answer the questions. Don't evade them, don't snip
>>them out, just answer them.
>>
>
>
> Maybe Jethro comes from Wales, where they love their animals.
> Really....Love them.
That's baa-aaa-aaa-aaa-aaa-aad.
|