pearl wrote:
<...>
>>>>Your silly comment does not refute my observation:
>>>>"omnivore" does not imply "eats leaves".
>>>
>>>What do you think OMNIvore means then, exactly?
>>
>>Omnivorous means "feeding on both animal and vegetable substances." It doesn't
>>necessarily mean an individual omnivore eats leaves.
>
> The fact remains-

....beyond your hare-brained grasp.

> all (truly) omnivorous species include some leaves in their diet.

The discussion was over individuals, not entire species.

>><...>
>>
>>>>>A specialized carnivorous adaptation in humans that would
>>>>>correspond to a minimized gut size is obviously not supported
>>>>>by our data (fig. 1). Hladik et al. [1999, pp.696-697] '
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat
>>>>
>>>>"Minimized gut size" is not the only possible
>>>>carnivorous adaptation.
>>>
>>>That was the specific subject of this post.
>>>What else do you want to postulate?
>>
>>You have been debunked now that the Mr Woods has offered a more verbatim quote.
>
> 'Mr Woods'?

Yes, some of us are respectful toward others. Too bad you've no manners.

<...>