"usual suspect" > wrote in message ...
> pearl wrote:
> <...>
> >>Your silly comment does not refute my observation:
> >>"omnivore" does not imply "eats leaves".
> >
> > What do you think OMNIvore means then, exactly?
>
> Omnivorous means "feeding on both animal and vegetable substances." It doesn't
> necessarily mean an individual omnivore eats leaves.

The fact remains- all (truly) omnivorous species include some leaves in their diet.

> <...>
> >>>A specialized carnivorous adaptation in humans that would
> >>>correspond to a minimized gut size is obviously not supported
> >>>by our data (fig. 1). Hladik et al. [1999, pp.696-697] '
> >>>
> >>>http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat
> >>
> >>"Minimized gut size" is not the only possible
> >>carnivorous adaptation.
> >
> > That was the specific subject of this post.
> > What else do you want to postulate?
>
> You have been debunked now that the Mr Woods has offered a more verbatim quote.

'Mr Woods'? Psycho ball, as ever, is ****in' in the wind- and you're drenched, windbag.