John Coleman wrote:

>>Ipse dixit. BTW, are you immortal?
>
>
> this thread is about health and illness, not mortality
>
>
>>Post hoc fallacy.
>
>
> no a result confirmed by many raw foodists and documented by Ehret - science
> is about theories that can be confirmed by observation

There is no science, only a very obvious _post hoc_
fallacy: because you allege you haven't had colds or
flu since adopting a raw-foods diet 7 years ago, you
claim the diet caused it. That's classic _post hoc_
fallacious thinking. You have no peer-reviewed
research to back up your assertion that following a
foods diet improves health.

>
>
>>Taking vitamin pills to make up for your dietary deficiencies is NOT natural.
>
> the biochemistry cares not one hoot if the B12 is from a pill or a bug or a
> piece of faeces - it is all B12

It's not raw foods when it's a pill.

> however B12 from a stack of meat isn't healthy

Ipse dixit, and false. B12 is B12, and meat is not
intrinsically unhealthful.