"Crank" > wrote in message
om...
> wrote in message
>. ..
> > · From the life and death of a thousand pound grass raised
> > steer and whatever he happens to kill during his life, people
> > get over 500 pounds of human consumable meat...that's well
> > over 500 servings of meat. From a grass raised dairy cow people
> > get thousands of dairy servings. Due to the influence of farm
> > machinery, and *icides, and in the case of rice the flooding and
> > draining of fields, one meal of soy or rice based product is
> > likely to involve more animal deaths than hundreds of meals
> > derived from grass raised cattle. Grass raised cattle products
> > contribute to less wildlife deaths, better wildlife habitat, and
> > better lives for cattle than soy or rice products. ·
>
> Almost forgot -
=====================
What? To reply to the post where I did discuss views? I see you haven't
bothered. Cat got your tongue? Or have you finally realized the
hypocrisy of your participation on usenet.
in addition to the flaws of this argument, it is all
> abstract figures that cannot be proven. I think that with a little
> searching for...get this...*un*biased research you'll find your facts
> aren't quite in line with the truth. Not to mention you're taking
> off-kilter "facts" and using them as a standard when such things as
> the average number of collateral damage deaths can never really be
> proven. A study on 500 square yards does not define all farmed
> territory, but again, anti-AR false studies rear their ugly head again
> and again.
>
> CrankyVegan