so you have a bottle fetish?

and a faggot interest?



figures since you're that dumbass laura.


"Ron Hamilton" > wrote in message
m...
> veganagev wrote:
>> of course dipshit we don't give a **** about the lack of quality and
>> verve in your life.
>
> Of course, you shit-4-braincell "vegan" ****nozzle, we don't give a ****
> about any ****ing thing you have to say. Stick a broken bottle up your
> gaping HIV-oozing shitter, you goddamned limp-wristed "vegan" faggot.
>
>
>> other than the pillow soaking and the long hours in the bathroom,
>> squealing the plumbing with the dog.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and
>>> presented no challenge:
>>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Leif Erikson >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied
>>>>> and presented no challenge:
>>>>>> You may truly be too stupid to understand
>>>>> I understand it fully. You are posing a false choice. The choice is
>>>>> not "decent lives for farm animals" vs "no life".
>>>> In the case of farm animals who have decent lives, it is
>>>> that or no life.
>>> NO, Goo. That is not the choice. There are *two* choices, you stupid
>>> ****ing shit-4-braincell cracker. First is the choice of existence or
>>> not. IF, and only if, the animals exist, then there is a choice of
>>> "decent lives" or not. The phony choice you try to present is bullshit,
>>> Goo.
>>>
>>> Of course, Goo, you don't give a **** about the quality of lives for
>>> farm animals. All you care about is the products that can be obtained
>>> from them.
>>