veganagev wrote:
> of course dipshit we don't give a **** about the lack of quality and verve
> in your life.

Of course, you shit-4-braincell "vegan" ****nozzle, we don't give a ****
about any ****ing thing you have to say. Stick a broken bottle up your
gaping HIV-oozing shitter, you goddamned limp-wristed "vegan" faggot.


> other than the pillow soaking and the long hours in the bathroom, squealing
> the plumbing with the dog.
>
>
>
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and
>> presented no challenge:
>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Leif Erikson > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and
>>>> presented no challenge:
>>>>> You may truly be too stupid to understand
>>>> I understand it fully. You are posing a false choice. The choice is not
>>>> "decent lives for farm animals" vs "no life".
>>> In the case of farm animals who have decent lives, it is
>>> that or no life.
>> NO, Goo. That is not the choice. There are *two* choices, you stupid
>> ****ing shit-4-braincell cracker. First is the choice of existence or
>> not. IF, and only if, the animals exist, then there is a choice of
>> "decent lives" or not. The phony choice you try to present is bullshit,
>> Goo.
>>
>> Of course, Goo, you don't give a **** about the quality of lives for farm
>> animals. All you care about is the products that can be obtained from
>> them.
>
>