of course dipshit we don't give a **** about the lack of quality and verve
in your life.

other than the pillow soaking and the long hours in the bathroom, squealing
the plumbing with the dog.



"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
...
> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and
> presented no challenge:
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Leif Erikson > wrote:
>>
>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and
>>> presented no challenge:
>>
>>>> You may truly be too stupid to understand
>>> I understand it fully. You are posing a false choice. The choice is not
>>> "decent lives for farm animals" vs "no life".
>>
>> In the case of farm animals who have decent lives, it is
>> that or no life.
>
> NO, Goo. That is not the choice. There are *two* choices, you stupid
> ****ing shit-4-braincell cracker. First is the choice of existence or
> not. IF, and only if, the animals exist, then there is a choice of
> "decent lives" or not. The phony choice you try to present is bullshit,
> Goo.
>
> Of course, Goo, you don't give a **** about the quality of lives for farm
> animals. All you care about is the products that can be obtained from
> them.