Suckhard wrote:
>>
>>>>>>I read enough
>>>>>
>>>>>You didn't read any of it. Why are you lying?
>>>>
>>>>He probably gets headaches when he reads stuff he has to think about.
>>>
>>>I've come to the conclusion
>>
>>You don't think hard enough to reach conclusions.
>>
>>
>>>that you're easily influenced;
>>
>>That's what I thought of you when Lesley and others helped you overcome
>>your position on rabbits versus people. Too bad you couldn't hold your
>>ground on why vivisection can be of benefit to man AND beast.
>>
>>
>>>first by veganism,
>>
>>My embrace was of *food*, not of politics or labels associated with it.
>>That's something which I've been clear about since posting at AFV, and
>>why I so easily discarded that label when given enough information and
>>experience with "vegans."
>
> I think the opposite. You went FOR the label.

Nope. I thought it was solely about the diet. If it were, I'd use the
label. I'm content to be vegetarian or any other name, just as long as
there's no political or ethical assumption linked to the label.

>>>...Why don't you grow up, and stop playing
>>>second fiddle to the wee baldy man from California?
>>
>>You accuse both Jon and me of stalking, harassing, etc., though we both
>>substantively address posts and issues raised in these groups.
>
> What a load of ****ing ********.
>
> He targets women

Women like you?
Women like Ray?
Women like Dreck?
Women like Davey?
Women like Jon Falafel Lindsay?

> and you're so easily influenced by your guru that you
> blindly follow him.

I'm operating under my own influence.

> The last few days has been dedicated to washing other
> peoples dirty linen, and absolutely NOTHING to do with the newsgroups'
> subjects.

I expect you to keep Karen, Lesley, Raymond, Dreck, et al, in line then.

>>Yet when
>>I read your posts, they're never substantive. Never!
>
> More lies from the texan pansy boy.

Ad hominem evasion. When was your last substantive post?

>>What are your
>>posts? Nothing but remarks cruelly noting characteristics of birth and
>>attempts to agitate.
>
> He and you are just getting what you dish out that all. It's a bit of fun
> for me.

Simpletons like you are easily amused.

>>That's harassment. That's stalking. Why don't you
>>try addressing issues -- rather than physical characteristics -- for a
>>change, asshole?
>
> **** off pansy boy.

Deal with issues from now on, asshole.