On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:07 -0500, Lou Decruss >
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:
>
>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>>>
>>> >> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
>>> >> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
>>> >> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
>>> >> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
>>> >> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>>>
>>> >> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> >I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but
>>> >females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
>>> >dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite.
>>>
>>> >N.
>>>
>>> it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
>>> public johns, for they are delicate creatures.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public
>>restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those
>>little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers.
>
>The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything
>it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too.
>
>Lou

god have mercy.

your pal,
blake