Impotence wrote:

> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>SuckHard wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Dutch" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>SuckHard > wrote in message
.. .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
arthlink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Impotence wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>news:wnQZb.4022>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I hope this helps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No it doesn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It does. You're too stupid and hate-filled to get it
>>>>>>and acknowledge it.
>>>>>
>>>>>**** off ball, you ****ing evil baldy dwarf.
>>>>>
>>>>>All you done tonight is attack and harangue and be self congratulatory
>>>>
>>>>with
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>your cohort texmex, and you post this shit, and expect it to be taken
>>>>>seriously. LOL, you stupid ****.
>>>>
>>>>Aside from your dislike for the author, what specifically do you
>
> disagree
>
>>>>with about the proposition?
>>>
>>>
>>>It's SHIT.
>>
>>That's not specific at all. What is it with which you
>>disagree? Actually, we all know already that it's
>
>
> Who's "we all"?

Think about it for a couple of decades, GregGeorge.

>
>
>>merely the fact that I wrote it; you didn't really read it.
>
>
> I read enough to determine it was shit

No, you didn't.