On Jun 10, 11:59*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>
> >> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
> >> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
> >> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
> >> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
> >> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>
> >> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but
> >females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
> >dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite.
>
> >N.
>
> it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
> public johns, for they are delicate creatures.
>
> your pal,
> blake- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public
restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those
little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers.

N.