SeeJames Strut and 'civility'
ipse dixit wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message .net...
> > You've never understood it, Dreck, and you prove it
> > with every post. You do not understand it, and you
> > never will.
>
> Rather, I've proved that it is you who doesn't
> understand them because I've shown that the
> tool I use for evaluating conditional syllogisms
> exists while you categorically stated it didn't.
> Hey stupid, you've been bettered!
>
> > It's what comes of the combination of
> > ignorance, arrogance and pig-headedness. It goes a
> > long way to explain why you're a cripple.
> >
> This is most typical of you to try attacking your
> opponent on something completely off-topic
> when you're beaten. Let's face it, it's all you
> have, and when we look at your desperate
> attempts to strike back in this way you do look
> rather pathetic and wounded, so the gain is mine
> after all is said and done.
Exactly right!
|