ipse dixit wrote:

> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message k.net...
>
> > He doesn't understand it
>
> It's obvious you're having problems with simple
> syllogisms as well as Dutch, and this was earlier
> shown when you categorically stated that the
> tool I use for evaluating them doesn't exist. I've
> shown you that it does exist, so my guess is that
> you're equally as lost as Dutch and Kevin on them.
>
> > You forgot chronically drunk, and an animal beater: he
> > practically broke the back of his dog from beating on
> > it with a broom handle.
>
> You see, after a while when everyone gets to
> see your penchant for lying about your opponents
> who beat you, they, like me get to understand why
> you do it. Every beating you get makes you lie about
> them in a kind of childish retaliation, and if you run
> out of your own material you'll use the same lies
> someone else has used, as in this instance, even
> when the source has previously admitted the material
> you're using was a lie. Aren't you at all embarrassed
> while showing the World what a wounded little man
> you are?

Very well said my friend. Cowards like Mr Ball give the family a bad name!