"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message k.net...
>
> I told you: the discussion is over.

I could've told you that before you even started it.
I can refute any damn ****ing argument you care
to offer in these animal related groups, sonny.
You're ****ed.

> Feel free to
> waste your time, Dreck, but you're not wasting any more
> of mine than I choose to give.

Run for that door, nebbish.

> You do not understand logic

Yes, I do.

> and your prattle about
> "necessary" and "consequent" and "antecedent" shows it.

I've shown that it is a valid tool for evaluating
conditional propositions. You need to learn it.