> wrote in message
news
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:16:41 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
> >"ipse dixit" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> >> "Dutch" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> > "ipse dixit" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> > > "Benfez" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> > > > snip
> >> > > > It may help you to understand that a short but high
> >> > > > quality life is far superior to no life at all.
> >> > > >
> >> > > Thanks for that, Benfez.
> >> >
> >> > For what? Your claim was that "most meatarians" subscribe to this
> >notion,
> >> > that's now two, out of billions. You're a little short of supporting
> >your
> >> > claim..
> >> >
> >> The original claim was that only Harrison believed
> >> a short life as a farm animal was better than no life
> >> at all.
> >>
> >> "There is exactly one person you've ever read in
> >> these newsgroups who believes the "animals getting
> >> to experience life" crapola, and EVERY omnivore
> >> apart from ****wit who has ever addressed the
> >> issue with him has told him his "theory" is bullshit."
> >> Jonathan Ball 2003-06-25
> >>
> >> But that obviously isn't the case.
> >
> >That obviously wasn't the claim. He said "there is exactly one person
> >*you've ever read in these newsgroups* who believes the "animals getting
to
> >experience life" crapola, " He didn't say there was only one person.
Since
> >the logic of the larder is thousands of years old it stands to reason
there
> >are a few people floating around who subscribe to the logic.
>
> There are a few people who understand that some farm animals
> benefit from farming and that some don't, as it has been for thousands
> of years. It's hard to believe that so many of YOU are too stupid to
> understand such an obvious fact, but you prove it to be the case
> over and over again.

Like I said, there are bound to be a few of you nitwits floating around.