No need for farm animals.
"Jahnu" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:14:35 -0500, "rick etter"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Jahnu" > wrote in message
>
> >> Of course it has. Keeping animals for slaughter is grossly sinful.
> >=================
> >Killing animals for your selfishness and entertainment is more a sin,
> >killer.
>
> You mean like in automated slaughter houses that kill at the rate of
> 7000 chicken a second the world over all year round?
=====================
No, like the millions and millions of animals that die horrible, inhumane
deaths for nothing more than your cheap, convenient veggies, hypocrite.
You see, like all veg*n loons, all you can do is focus on what you think
others are doing. You're afraid to look inward at your own diet. You
follow only a simple rule for a simple mind, eat no meat. Never mind that
there are meats that cause far less animal death and environmental damge
than the food you eat now. Your religious zealotry doesn't allow you to
examine anything too closely, otherwise it would fall like the hause of
cards it is.
>
> >Why do you continue that death and suffering?
>
> How do you figure I do that?
======================
By eating fool. Do you really believe that your diet is cruelty free?
I am the one who is preaching against the
> slaughter house culture. You defend institutions that put billions and
> billions of animals through countless cruelties every year the world
> over to keep up the coca cola culture.
==================
What a coinsidence, so do you, especially since you eat lots of imported
food stuffs.
>
Now, go have that nice blood-drenched dinner, killer.
|