On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:42:54 GMT, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
>"Dan Abel" > wrote in message
...
>> In article <IC3Pj.1577$Ks1.485@trnddc01>,
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> personal info has ever been misused? Not like anyone today has ever had
>>> their privacy invaded by a bank because of something to do with their car
>>> insurance.
>>
>> If you financed your car through that bank, they own it. Just try to
>> find the title to the car. The bank has it. If you look at your
>> registration paper, it says you are the registered owner, and the spot
>> for the legal owner has the name of the bank.
>>
>And if you miss a payment your medical insurance should not be affected.
>However, it does. And that is my point. That being we are just losing all
>of our privacy so why make it so easy for them to know more about you than
>your own mother?
>
>> It's their car, they have a right to make sure there is insurance on it
>> (your sales contract must certainly have had a provision that requires
>> you to carry insurance, I've never seen one without it).
>
>Yes but that is not the point I am making.
>
>Paul
>

o.k., what is the point you're making? all you been doing is making
scare talk that has nothing to do with grocery store sales records.

your pal,
blake