On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:08:19 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>"Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>
>> It's simply not that cut and dried. The legality of any ID is questionable
>> and the courts have set precedents on the subject. IDs, any IDs, are not
>> constitutional prerequisites for voting.
>
>Do you have a cite of some state that has abolished asking for ID's
>to vote based on your claims of it being unconstitutional?
>
>-sw

no one is saying you need not identify yourself to vote. state laws
requiring *a photo i.d.* are currently under litigation at the supreme
court level:

<http://www.diverseeducation.com/artman/publish/article_10465.shtml>

your pal,
blake