"Purple" > wrote in message
om...
> wrote in message
>. ..
> > On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:33:12 -0500, "Allyb" > wrote:
> >
> > >Karla, the flaw I see in your reasoning is that to satisfy the demand
for
> > >meat and dairy in this country, it's not possible to raise enough
animals on
> > >grass.
> >
> > That's not what is being discussed, which I feel sure you are aware
of.
> > What is being discussed is why tofu involves more animal deaths than
> > grass raised beef does, and why rice milk involves more animal deaths
> > than grass raised cow milk does. (Rice milk also involves more deaths
> > than soy milk, which involves more deaths than grass raised cow milk...
> > are you unable to understand why?)
> > But since you brought it up, we have no reason to believe that this
> > country could be fed if no farm animals were raised at all, which is
what
> > "ARAs" want. Animal products go into fertilizers and many other things
> > that humans--including veg*ns--make much use of:
>
> [snip extensive list of products]
>
> There are vegan alternatives for many, perhaps all of the items you list.
================
LOL And you really think they are made without the death and suffering of
animals? What a hoot!