"Rat & Swan" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Jonathan Ball wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > The statement that Karen supports the only important aim of NAMBLA - the
> > complete elimination of age of consent laws - is true.
>
> That I support the abolition of age of consent laws is true, for
> the reason I gave. I do not believe anarchy means "might makes right"
> either.

Um...I said that, not Jon. It's how I view anarchy.

> > Karen thinks
> > there's nothing wrong with an adult man having sex with a small boy of
> > any age.
>
> And this, OTOH, is false.

Then I must ask: what do you offer in place of the age of consent laws?
There is, after all, a reason why we have those laws.