On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:15:39 -0400, "jmcquown" >
wrote:

>Goomba38 wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>> LOL Goomba, I agree with you! I must ask, though, why don't you
>>> filter OT posts if you despise them so much? <G>
>>
>> Which part of this original thread was OT that it warranted a filter?
>> For christsake, it was a stove (sort of kitchen-y, y'know?) But the
>> instant way some folks start slinging shit gets really, REALLY old.
>>
>No, no, no, I didn't type clearly. I didn't mean this thread was OT. Just
>saying, you despise OT threads but seem to reply to them frequently.
>
>I agree about the constant name-calling and other crap (and yes, I admit I'm
>guilty). It's like I said to Greg, if "cybercat" posts something directed
>towards or referring to me I'd rather he not quote it. I wouldn't see that
>particular bit of sewage if he wasn't hell bent on replying to everything
>she posts.
>
With my newsreader I can ignore a given poster and all replies to
them. I probably miss a few messages that I might otherwise read, but
I doubt if it is very many.
--
Susan N.

"Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral,
48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy."
Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974)