Rat & Swan wrote:

>
>
> Susan Kennedy wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> In point of fact, I don't know much about ARAs.
>
>
> Thank you for keeping an open mind. ARAs vary just as much as any other
> group, from peaceful philosophers advocating non-violence, to radical
> and violent types, just as in the 1960's, the Civil Rights movement
> included everyone from pacifist people going South to register voters,
> to the violent Weathermen and Black Panthers. You'd have to ask any
> individual ARA where he stands.
>
> <snip>
>
>> As the only one on this side of the argument who appears to be rational
>> about the whole thing, (you argue the points instead of throwing around
>> accusations) I would like to ask you one thing. Do you know if the
>> NAMBLA
>> accusations are true?
>
>
> In short, no.

The long AND short of it is: YES, the accusation -
that you support the only goal of NAMBLA is true.
Their goal is the total decriminalization of men
****ing boys of any age, and you support that goal.
You claim to believe that boys of any age can give
consent to being ****ed in the ass by adult men.