"googlesux" > wrote in message
om...
> wrote in message
>. ..
>
> > Let's not forget that veg*ns contribute to animal deaths in *most*
of
> > the same ways that everyone else does--their diet only being one of
> > those ways. All they try to avoid are the deaths of animals who wouldn't
> > have had any life at all if it were not for meat consumers, though they
> > still contribute to their deaths by using *many* products which contain
> > animal by-products. Considering things like that shows that veg*nism
> > doesn't do anything to help any animals.
>
> You know, you save a lot of lives by driving carefully, but chances
> are you occasionally run over a squirrel, a frog, or such. So you
> might as well just mow down as many pedestrians as you can -- what's
> the use?
===========================
Man, you really need to stop trying to use analogys, They really are too
hard for you.
There are laws about running down people. There are consequences for doing
such.
Physical or monetary consequences. Even if it isn't deliberate. Millions
is spent on reducing these accidents.
training, signs, better roads, better cars.
No penalties are involved for running over an animal.
Same as for your food. You even pay people to kill animals just to keep you
food clean, cheap, and convenient.