"Derek" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bill" > wrote in message
. net...
> > Derek wrote:
> > > "Bill/Jonathan Ball/etc. etc." > wrote in message
.net...
> > >>Derek wrote:
> > >>>"Bill/Jonathan Ball/etc. etc." > wrote in message
. net...
> > >>>
> > >>>>Which "vegans" here on usenet have done *anything*
> > >>>>concrete to stop killing them? None.
> > >>>
> > >>>Which vegans here on Usenet have done *anything*
> > >>>concrete to start killing them? None.
> > >>
> > >>All of them
> > >
> > > False.
> >
> > No, true.
> >
> It cannot be. Logic insists farmers cause them, so they
> are to blame.
======================
Nope. Your pal, Aristotle, has even told you, in english, that you are
complicit, killer.


>
> > > Vegans are not the cause of animal or human
> > > collateral deaths in agriculture.
> >
> > "vegans" are morally complicit in the collateral deaths
> > of animals, if there is anything wrong with it at all.
>
> There's plenty wrong with it, and farmers are to blame,
> buckpasser.
==================
No, it's your passing the bucks over to the farmer as a rewrd for his
actions that make you complicit, hypocrite.


>
> > You don't need to trade with the farmer; you choose
> > to do so, rewarding him each and every time.
> >
> I only reward him for what I buy from him. I do not buy
> the deaths he causes, so they are his.
=======================
Nope. Check with Ari again, fool.


>
> > This is not in honest dispute.
> >
> I'm disputing it.
>
>