"Derek" > wrote >
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote

[..]
> > >>>>Some people with more time on their hands than sense
> > >>>>(and a guilty conscience) claim, without evidence, that
> > >>>>the cocoa crop in West Africa is harvested using child
> > >>>>slave labor. It isn't.
> > >>>
> > >>>There IS plenty of evidence proving it exists,
> > >>
> > >>None. It doesn't exist.
> > >
> > > There IS plenty of evidence proving it exists.
> >
> > It doesn't exist.
>
> It was there a minute ago. What've you done with it?

Instead of going back and forth endlessly about a semantic difference, why
not make the claim that one supports "indentured servitude" by consuming
these products? Doesn't that present your point just as well?