The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
Julie wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:54:14 -0800, Rudy Canoza
> > wrote:
>
>> Julie wrote:
>>> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:46:20 -0800, Rudy Canoza
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jette wrote:
>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> Julie wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:02:13 -0000, "Jill" >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julie wrote:
>>>>>>>>> No Jim that's a blatant lie. When was the last time anyone saw
>>>>>>>>> livestock grazing on a well managed arable farm?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you agree with all artificial inputs to replenish the land?
>>>>>>> No. We have a choice?
>>>>>> Organic farming virtually requires animal manure. But if "vegans"
>>>>>> suppress animal husbandry, there won't be any manure. Kind of a
>>>>>> paradox, eh?
>>>>> And for those who claim to care about the animals, it seems callous to
>>>>> want to slaughter all the livestock so that you can turn pasture over to
>>>>> growing crops humans can eat.
>>>> Well, we're going to slaughter the livestock anyway, so
>>>> that's not really an issue. The big thing for
>>>> "vegans"/"aras" is that they don't want any *more*
>>>> livestock to exist.
>>> I don't think there's any room for you in this matinee jonny,
>> I'm here, pete, and you'll take it and you'll like it.
>
> No Jonny you're not.
Yes, shitbag pete, I am - and you'll take it and you'll
like it.
|