On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:01:29 -0000, "Jill" >
wrote:

>Julie wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:34:52 -0000, "Jill" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Julie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There will always be horses and other livestock. They just wont have
>>>> to endure the suffering to feed fat faces like yours.
>>>
>>> There might be horses, but there would be little else.
>>> You do not breed if you do not cull.
>>
>> We'll have plenty of livestock for the next fifty years even if
>> livestock farming was stopped.
>
>If livestock farming was stopped then the livestock would end. Then.
>No-one would feed livestock for no reason.

Yes we, society would. You are obviously so far removed it's painful.

>>> Otherwise the country would be overpopulated with starving sheep.
>>
>> The farmers wont let them breed.
>
>The farmers would not keep them.

Nothing new there then!

>>> [we have already managed to do that to our deer population]
>>
>> No we haven't. We have managed to artificially boost many wildlife
>> especially deer by the constant slaughtering of them. This causes them
>> to breed at maximum rates and constantly. It throws the whole natural
>> cycle out of synch. You might think we have a deer problem but I can
>> assure you the shooters don't!
>
>I suggest some reading into the subject.

Great idea when will you start?