View Single Post
  #65 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,uk.environment.conservation,uk.business.agriculture
Julie[_3_] Julie[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:54:00 -0000, "Jill" >
wrote:

>Julie wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:30:40 -0000, "Jill" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Julie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Horse shit!!! is around in abundance. In fact the world cannot
>>>> give it away these days, more than enough to go round.
>>>
>>> With plenty of wormers and other substances in which would kill the
>>> insect life in the soil.

>>
>> Really where does it say that?

>
>Do you not know about this?
>I am surprised.


How long will you be stalling for?

>>> Clever one
>>> There are also not enough equines in the right places so you would be
>>> increasing your carbon footprint drastically moving this high bulk
>>> low quality item around the country.

>>
>> Try and keep up Jill.

>
>I am keeping up, you seem to have not researched your subject and have no
>answers for simple straight forward questions.


They are not questions they are nonsense obstacles proving you are
just a troll.

>> <snip trolling>

>
>Not trolling, simply endeavouring to find out how you propose to support
>your new ecosystem, only to find you have no answers.


You are trolling and it's quite blatant a diversionary tactic to take
us away from the unsustainability of meat production in the modern
world. Which if we don't change quickly will not last much longer.

You can play chase your tail or punch & judy with Jim. When you are
ready for serious discussion come back.

>> If you cant be sensible about it get lost.

>
>Why, because you are shown to not understand some basic ecology and
>logistics?


>I am interested to hear how you make your system work, how you sustain food
>productivity for all the people now and the growing population in the future
>using the circumstances we are in NOW, not those of a time when the common
>rural way of life involved subsistance living and no Ipods.
>At the same time reducing the carbon footprint, creating a sustainable rural
>economy and protecting the land we need to feed ourselves with.


You've already been told and shown easily viable alternatives which
we, the planet will need to adopt if we are to save ourselves for
anything like a decent future. You have no comprehension of what's
involved so I suppose breeding a couple of fluffy chickens doesn't a
farmer make!