The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
Julie wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:46:20 -0800, Rudy Canoza
> > wrote:
>
>> Jette wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> Julie wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:02:13 -0000, "Jill" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Julie wrote:
>>>>>>> No Jim that's a blatant lie. When was the last time anyone saw
>>>>>>> livestock grazing on a well managed arable farm?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you agree with all artificial inputs to replenish the land?
>>>>> No. We have a choice?
>>>> Organic farming virtually requires animal manure. But if "vegans"
>>>> suppress animal husbandry, there won't be any manure. Kind of a
>>>> paradox, eh?
>>> And for those who claim to care about the animals, it seems callous to
>>> want to slaughter all the livestock so that you can turn pasture over to
>>> growing crops humans can eat.
>> Well, we're going to slaughter the livestock anyway, so
>> that's not really an issue. The big thing for
>> "vegans"/"aras" is that they don't want any *more*
>> livestock to exist.
>
> I don't think there's any room for you in this matinee jonny,
I'm here, pete, and you'll take it and you'll like it.
Simple.
|