The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:15 -0000, "Jim Webster"
> wrote:
>
>"Jill" > wrote in message
...
>> Julie wrote:
>>>
>>> There will always be horses and other livestock. They just wont have
>>> to endure the suffering to feed fat faces like yours.
>>
>> There might be horses, but there would be little else.
>> You do not breed if you do not cull.
>> Otherwise the country would be overpopulated with starving sheep.
>> [we have already managed to do that to our deer population]
>
>oh goodie, so we have all this land being used to feed livestock that
>doesn't actually contribute to human nutrition. Effectively using livestock
>as a green manure, meaning that you only get a food crop from it perhaps
>three years in ten
>Far less efficient that what we do now when at least we eat the livestock
>Jim Webster
It's quite painful to see the village idiots playing on their own..
Which one are you. Judy?
|