Hello Will, you jumping in to take sides now. This is not a
personality contest, it's not Big Brother, I'm sure Kenneth is lovely,
I replied to him in that way because I thought his criticisms were
pointless and meaningless, I thought he was just trying to make out I
was wrong without being able to back it up with anything and concluded
perhaps wrongly or rightly that he was saying more about something
else than bread.

He then got a bit personal by saying " Beyond that, I have no idea
what set you off, but your hostility is a far greater burden to you
than it is to me"

I don't think that's very polite.

Anyway, perhaps it's best left as it is rather than getting one of
those pointless 'he's a nice guy, she's a nice lady' threads going,
because nobody bothers to read what's written past the first comment
resulting in no balance. The whole things becomes just a mess. Kenneth
has also been great and inspired me with one or two things and I've
said so on many occasions. On this occasion he's acting like a prig.
No one's perfect though Will.

Jim


On 4 Mar, 14:40, Will > wrote:
> On Mar 4, 5:43 am, TG > wrote:
>
> > *I have no feelings towards you because I don't know you...
>
> Well Jim... I suppose I could say I don't know Kenneth either. I've
> never seen him, or heard him speak...but I've been reading his posts
> for several years and even replied to a few. He's one of the more
> knowledgeable contributors to this community. If RFS ever had a
> convention, Kenneth is one of the folks I'd want to meet.
>
> Why don't you lighten up... Kenneth's original point about inoculation
> was correct and it was polite. That bears repeating... it was correct
> and it was POLITE.
>
> Will