blake murphy wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 06:51:03 -0700, "Janet Bostwick"
> > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:34:58 -0800, Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> It really surprises me, with all the latest developments in camera
>>>> surveillance systems, that no one has even thought about monitoring
>>>> the kitchen areas of restaurants with cameras and recording the
>>>> results for a certain number of days. However, IMHO, they should do
>>>> just that, and clearly post signs in the kitchen notifying the
>>>> staff they are being monitored and recorded.
>>>
>>> Logan's Roadhouse's grills are behind a glass wall where the
>>> customers can see in. If that doesn't stop the cooks from
>>> ****ing with the food, then nothing will.
>>>
>>> You could also put up web cams and offer in-house surveillance of
>>> the kitchen from the customers table for anyone with a laptop.
>>> Or just have a monitor on each table.
>>>
>>> Or they could offer fecal, saliva, and human DNA test strips for
>>> your food. They would come rolled up in your hermetically-sealed
>>> napkin along with the autoclaved silverware.
>>>
>>> Or... Or...
>>>
>>> -sw
>> Don't you think this happens with any regularity? If you don't,
>> then you haven't heard (or overheard) teenage boys or young men
>> bragging about it. Janet
>>
>
> and teenage boys and young men would never lie about such a thing.
> make sure to ask them about their sex lives, too.
>
> your pal,
> blake

Now how do you suppose this happened?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/29....ap/index.html
Flks with a mind-set to spit in the mashed potatoes go on to bigger things.
Janet