View Single Post
  #31 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,free.uk.politics.animal-rights,uk.politics.animals
Rudy Canoza Rudy Canoza is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 113
Default FAQ: The Irrational 'Search for Micrograms (of Animal Parts)'

On Feb 26, 4:42 pm, wrote:
> > Most people who consume animal parts do not accept your

> inflammatory
>
> > and inaccurate language about "subjugating" other animals. That's not
> > what it is. Instead, they recognize, correctly, that animals do not
> > have rights, and that no moral wrong is being done by consuming them.
> > They further recognize that it is morally incoherent to suggest
> > animals could hold "rights" against us, but not against other
> > predators that would also consume them.- Hide quoted text -

>
> > - Show quoted text -

>
> You claim that "animals do not have rights, and that no moral wrong is
> being done by consuming them."
> Does your moral code permit you to consume any non-human
> species?


Such as?