On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:45:02 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:

>Chelsea Gint wrote:
>>>hmmmm....it seems to me that the way to cause the least suffering is
>>>get a rifle and go shoot a moose or an elk. Then you'd have a years
>>>supply of meat for only a few moments' suffering.
>>
>> Why not .. 'get a rifle and shoot yourself'? Then you'd cause least
>> suffering for 'only a few moments' suffering'.
>
>Oh, feel the love. Misanthrope.

It's a good statement, I see no reason for it to happen.

>> Or maybe just grow and/or buy eco-friendly organic plant produce.
>> .
>
>Hunting is eco-friendly.

Hunting is an abuse of wildlife, usually by lard arse, unemployed
deviants, who also subject their families to the same abuse.

> Have you seen how much destruction uncontrolled
>ruminant populations can do to an ecosystem, much less when they start
>to starve?

Hunting does not control wildlife populations, aside from keeping them
artificially high to provide amusement for bullies.







'You can't win 'em all.'
Lord Haw Haw.

Since I stopped donating money to CONservation hooligan charities
Like the RSPB, Woodland Trust and all the other fat cat charities
I am in the top 0.801% richest people in the world.
There are 5,951,930,035 people poorer than me

If you're really interested I am the 48,069,965
richest person in the world.

And I'm keeping the bloody lot.

So sue me.

http://www.globalrichlist.com/