See James Strut wrote:
> http://www.post-gazette.com//pg/03273/227089.stm


Off topic, jimmy, you asshole. This is supposed to be
a forum for the discussion of vegetarian *food*, not
for patting yourself on the back for being a
health-obsessed freak.

Anyway, that study is bad science. It's right there in
the press release:

Other studies have shown that vegetarians have a
lower risk of heart disease and cancer, while people
who eat large amounts of red meat have an increased
risk.

It commits the logical fallacy of false bifurcation,
asswipe. The choice is not between vegetarian diet or
"large amounts of red meat". In fact, I eat a diet
that contains relatively small amounts of meat, and not
a lot of it red.

You sanctimonious self congratulatory shitbag. You're
also a skinny geek.