On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:25:08 -0800, Leonard Blaisdell
> wrote:

>In article >, sf wrote:
>
>> I don't think we get rolled roasts around here... but don't denigrate
>> chuck roasts, they are pretty damned good.
>
>How am I going to get myself out of this one? I always choose chuck for
>pot roast. Almost always. Top sirloin is grand too. I love pot roast.
>But presenting the in-laws with a chuck pot roast instead of a prime rib
>is like me presenting you with a zircon instead of a diamond. I'd prefer
>presenting an industrial grade diamond and pawning it off as special. A
>slow cooked sirloin roast might do that. I'm getting myself in deeper,
>aren't I?
>
LOLOL! Make it a rump roast, Leo.... not sirloin.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first