A1 WBarfieldsr on 22 Oct 2003 suggested:

>
>
> "Frogleg" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Are you for real? Who do you think "chooses" poverty over wealth? I
>> must have missed sending in the form that says "if you'd rather live
>> in San Francisco with an income of $150,000 than in rural Nicaragua
>> with $3,000, please check this box."
>
> My point exactly, NOBODY. What I'm getting, is scorn for proposing
> that the workers in the factories should not live in poverty. I'm the
> hated one for wishing for a better life for the workers in these
> countries that exploit the people, by keeping them in poverty through
> low wages.

No, you're getting scorn for making statements that don't fit
reality, making ignorant comments about people's living conditions about
which they may not have any control over, and suggesting that the people
who are spending all their time to keep their families alive now
threaten their own limited economic viability by rebelling and perhaps
lowering their income to ZERO.

> NOBODY should have to work for $5.00 dollars per DAY and
> 48 hours per week. I think if my math is right that comes to about
> $45.00 per WEEK.

Perhaps in that reality that you live in, there are NINE days in
the week, but there aren't in mine. And actually, there would have to
be TEN days in the week, because workers are entitled to a day of rest.

--Douglas