Jerry,

What is written by the manufacturer about each yeast is not absolute.
The conditions that the yeast work under are so dramatically different
under each winemaker, and even each must, that the documentation that
is put out by the company should be used as a guide only. If you like
the results with 71B, then use it. There are winemakers who believe
there really is no difference in the yeasts if the wine is allowed to
age more than a year. With meads, I've read rave reviews about D-47
and there are some loyal users of D-47 out there but like they say,
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it.". If 71B is consistently good for
you and you like the results then toss the yeast's manufacturers write-
up in the garbage.

Bob

On Oct 30, 12:25 pm, wrote:
> Hello folks, coming out of lurking to pose a question from some
> results of mine. I recently started winemaking and have nine batches
> going (a couple are meads).
>
> So I have noticed that the batches I used Cote des Blancs on have no
> "rocket fuel taste" that I can pick up. Indeed, I can barely detect
> the alcohol in them (the missing .12 gravity point say it is there).
> Most of them were started with OG in the 1120-1130 range and less than
> two months old. My strawberry hasn't even cleared yet and tastes
> divine already.
>
> I do know what hot tastes like, I have a blueberry/banana that took
> 1136 down to 0.992 in seven days and the alcohol slaps you in the
> face. Didn't expect that from Lavlin 71B.
>
> So is this a common thing with this yeast? I must say that I like how
> it behaved. It wasn't fast, but steadily chugged along without foaming
> or getting violent. I chose it for low alcohol tolerance on some
> experiments with letting the ABV kill off the yeast with residual
> sweetness. My theory is that the slow ferment and low flocculation
> allow a complete chemical reaction during ferment instead of needing
> months/years for this to happen once the wine becomes still.
> How will this property translate into long term aging? Is this because
> it is missing in "chemical complexity" that reduce aging potential?
>
> Just curious about all this because I really like this yeast now and
> am contemplating using it almost exclusively until I run into musts
> that it doesn't like. I'm trying to build up a style similar to the
> mead guys that use starvation and cold-crashing to leave high OG musts
> semi-sweet. I am doing some dry wines, but just used less sugar
> instead of a "killer yeast".