Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?
"Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is. I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper, what's the advantage of cornstarch? However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't help. Lenona. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?
Lenona wrote:
> "Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is. > > I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it > seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper, > what's the advantage of cornstarch? > > However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always > burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't > help. > I always use cornstarch. It thickens quickly and has a neutral taste. If you are stirring constantly over a low heat you should not have a problem with burning. For the amount of corn starch used I can't see price being a concern. It's not that expensive. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?
"Lenona" > wrote in message ... > > "Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is. > > I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it > seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper, > what's the advantage of cornstarch? > > However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always > burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't > help. > > > Lenona. Read he http://www.foodsubs.com/ThickenStarch.html Flour will leave a starchy taste (unless cooked for an extended period) and an opaque result, corn starch does not have the starchy taste and the thickened product is clearer than using flour - also the "sheen' appearance is different. -- Dimitri Mirepoix http://kitchenguide.wordpress.com. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?
Dimitri wrote:
> > "Lenona" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is. >> >> I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it >> seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper, >> what's the advantage of cornstarch? >> >> However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always >> burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't >> help. >> > > Read he http://www.foodsubs.com/ThickenStarch.html > > Flour will leave a starchy taste (unless cooked for an extended period) > and an opaque result, corn starch does not have the starchy taste and > the thickened product is clearer than using flour - also the "sheen' > appearance is different. > > You're on the right track, but I would add that your standard pastry cream recipe is flour thickened and I've never detected a starchy taste to it after all the many times I've made it. I'd even say I like it better than corn starch thickened preparations. This is one of the many cases where tasting trumps reading. -- Reg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?
"RegForte" > wrote in message ... > Dimitri wrote: > >> >> "Lenona" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> "Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is. >>> >>> I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it >>> seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper, >>> what's the advantage of cornstarch? >>> >>> However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always >>> burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't >>> help. >>> >> >> Read he http://www.foodsubs.com/ThickenStarch.html >> >> Flour will leave a starchy taste (unless cooked for an extended period) >> and an opaque result, corn starch does not have the starchy taste and the >> thickened product is clearer than using flour - also the "sheen' >> appearance is different. >> >> > > You're on the right track, but I would add that > your standard pastry cream recipe is flour thickened > and I've never detected a starchy taste to it after all > the many times I've made it. I'd even say I like it better > than corn starch thickened preparations. This is one > of the many cases where tasting trumps reading. > Horse shit. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?
On Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 2:54:13 PM UTC-5, Lenona wrote:
> "Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is. > > I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it > seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper, > what's the advantage of cornstarch? > > However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always > burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't > help. > > > Lenona. go on youtube for recipe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cornstarch in cookies? | General Cooking | |||
Flour vs. cornstarch? | General Cooking | |||
Need help muy pronto: Using arrowroot instead of flour or cornstarch thickener in a rhubarb pie | General Cooking | |||
Cornstarch substitute? | General Cooking | |||
Cornstarch vs. Flour? | General Cooking |