![]() |
"Aseptic level"
"...0.825 ppm molecular is required to suppress growth of
Brettanomyces/Dekkera sp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae according to one study. [Beech et al]..." I'm pretty sure that this is the one that made me think that the "aseptic" level should be (was?) increased to 0.83 ppm. Since this is the level needed to cover "brett", I just automatically jacked up my levels the first time I read this. Am I confused about this ?? |
"Aseptic level"
"David C Breeden" > wrote in message ... > frederick ploegman ) wrote: > >"...0.825 ppm molecular is required to suppress growth of > >Brettanomyces/Dekkera sp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae according to one > >study. [Beech et al]..." > > >I'm pretty sure that this is the one that made me think that the "aseptic" > >level should be (was?) increased to 0.83 ppm. Since this is the level > >needed to cover "brett", I just automatically jacked up my levels the > >first time I read this. Am I confused about this ?? > > Nope, that seems right to me. > > The upper end of the aseptic level that I've seen (in Margalit's > books) is 0.8 molecular, so that's pretty close to 0.825. > > Brett is a a pain. > > Where's the above quote from? > > Dave For quote see: http://members.tripod.com/~BRotter/S...SO2%20and%20pH References are at the bottom of that page. HTH |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter