Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wednesday Betsy was working, so with lemon chicken we had a small glass each of
the leftovers of a Brocard Kimmeridgien (it had filled out a bit , more fruity than previous night, nice). When she left, I opened 375 of the 1999 La Chapelle de la Mission Haut Brion (Pessac-Léognan). Not showing a lot at first, just some blackcurrant fruit. Medium-bodied, moderately tannic. I kept going back occasionally as I worked at computer over 3 hours. Over the evening some pretty notes of flowers, smoke,tobacco and leather started to emerge; the fruit developed a redder profile. Will let the couple 750s wait a while longer. I also liked the '96 & '98 of this wine; would (on that limited experience) rank it near the top of the seconds. Would like to try the 2000, but every time I've seen it it's been north of $40 - too expensive for a second wine IMHO (I paid $19/750 for the '99). B+/A- Thursday Betsy had a committee meeting before performance, so left before I got home. David and I had leftovers, and I popped the cork on the 2001 Dominique Laurent "Cuvee Numero 1" Bourgogne, which I had picked up recently for $12. Concentrated black cherry fruit with a distinctively Burgundian earth note. There is some toasty oak (hey, this is Dominique Laurent), more than I would prefer, but it's not overbearing. Big and beefy for a Bourgogne Rouge, I wouldn't be happy if this was a $25 village Pommard, but a good value at this price. B/B+ D. Laurent reminds me a little of Verget. The more expensive wines garner acclaim/points, but I don't tend to like. But I seem to find the lowest end of their portfolios more attractive. Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. Dale Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Att: Wegman customers: what make this chain numero uno? | General Cooking | |||
TN: Dominuque Laurent (w/o apparent oak) | Wine | |||
[TN] '05 St. Laurent | Wine | |||
TN: CRB Numero 5, 2nd of Cos, '02 Lagrange | Wine | |||
Mish-mache | General Cooking |