![]() |
TN Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 - surprise, it still is quite drinkable
I had one bottle of Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 which I opened but
expected to be too old. It was a decent, but not top, wine in the mid 80s and likely at the peak then according to some old reviews. I was thus not expecting much, and had another bottle of younger wine as a backup. The fill was still in the low neck, and the cork was still sound, although a bit soft. The wine still is fairly deep in color with only moderate age showing around the rim. There is fairly intense black fruit such as cassis and blackberry. There is considerable mixed spice. The tannins are a bit dry as often is the case for old 66s, but not too intense. The acid balance is good. This is an old style common in Saint Emilion PP (pre- Parker). Such wines often can take many years to fully develop and can hold a long time after they mature. They can be very good matches for some foods. However they often do not make friends when young. I do not know if anyone makes this type of wine anymore. |
TN Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 - surprise, it still is quite drinkable
In message
ups.com> cwdjrxyz > wrote: > I had one bottle of Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 which I opened but > expected to be too old. It was a decent, but not top, wine in the mid > 80s and likely at the peak then according to some old reviews. I was > thus not expecting much, and had another bottle of younger wine as a > backup. The fill was still in the low neck, and the cork was still > sound, although a bit soft. > The wine still is fairly deep in color with only moderate age showing > around the rim. There is fairly intense black fruit such as cassis and > blackberry. There is considerable mixed spice. The tannins are a bit > dry as often is the case for old 66s, but not too intense. The acid > balance is good. This is an old style common in Saint Emilion PP (pre- > Parker). Such wines often can take many years to fully develop and > can hold a long time after they mature. They can be very good matches > for some foods. However they often do not make friends when young. I > do not know if anyone makes this type of wine anymore. It is not altogether surprising that this wine had stayed the course. As the poster says it is made in the traditional style which does keep and improve. It is, of course, a Premier Grand Cru Classé with sone of its vines situated just below Ausone and Belair and others adjacent to Pavie and above Moulin St. Geroges. It is still made in a traditional style - perhaps I should say once again now that that Stephane Derenoncourt has taken over from Michel Rolland as consultant oenologue. There are many Saint-Emilions — indeed I would say the great majority — who have not been influenced by what is often taken to be the Parker style of wine and who certainly do not make in an over-extracted up fornt fruity young drinking style very often, rightly or wrongly, associated with him. Indeed quite a number of growers openly and loudly eschew that style as well as avoiding a use of oak which may be inappropriate for the terroir or year or both. Needless to say one of the fascinations of the ”hill of a thousand crus• is just that — the enormous variations and differences between wines from the same grape varieties, albeit in different combinations and proportions. (I firmly believe that these differences, even between wines of the same year and same assemblage, give the complete answer to those of a simplistic frame of mind who say that it would help the consumer to have a label showing the grape varieties. Two wiens of th same year with, say 60% Merlot, 30% Cabernet Franc and 10% Cabernet Sauvingon, can be entirely differnt from each other so that any consumer liking one could be disappointed in buying a bottle of the other in the expectation of having a very similar wine.) Although it is true that some young Saint-Emilions may not make firneds when young I would say that even for the traditionally made ones, certainly those with a high percentage of Merlot, as La Gaffeliere has, there is great enjoyment in drinking them relatively young, even if it is tempered with a consciousness that one is committing infanticide. Tim Hartley |
TN Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 - surprise, it still is quite drinkable
In article
>, cwdjrxyz > wrote: > I had one bottle of Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 which I opened but > expected to be too old. It was a decent, but not top, wine in the mid > 80s and likely at the peak then according to some old reviews. I was > thus not expecting much, and had another bottle of younger wine as a > backup. The fill was still in the low neck, and the cork was still > sound, although a bit soft. > > The wine still is fairly deep in color with only moderate age showing > around the rim. There is fairly intense black fruit such as cassis and > blackberry. There is considerable mixed spice. The tannins are a bit > dry as often is the case for old 66s, but not too intense. The acid > balance is good. This is an old style common in Saint Emilion PP (pre- > Parker). Such wines often can take many years to fully develop and > can hold a long time after they mature. They can be very good matches > for some foods. However they often do not make friends when young. I > do not know if anyone makes this type of wine anymore. What a nice surprise. Last '66 I had a Ducru from that era in 2005 was faded though the provenance was good and the condition was good. |
TN Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 - surprise, it still is quitedrinkable
On Jul 12, 2:01*am, cwdjrxyz > wrote:
> I had one bottle of Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 which I opened but > expected to be too old. It was a decent, but not top, wine in the mid > 80s and likely at the peak then according to some old reviews. I was > thus not expecting much, and had another bottle of younger wine as a > backup. The fill was still in the low neck, and the cork was still > sound, although a bit soft. > > The wine still is fairly deep in color with only moderate age showing > around the rim. There is fairly intense black fruit such as cassis and > blackberry. There is considerable mixed spice. The tannins are a bit > dry as often is the case for old 66s, but not too intense. The acid > balance is good. This is an old style common in Saint Emilion PP (pre- > Parker). *Such wines often can take many years to fully develop and > can hold a long time after they mature. They can be very good matches > for some foods. However they often do not make friends when young. I > do not know if anyone makes this type of wine anymore. Pretty good for a '66 RB, I have a vague sense of it being more of a Medoc vintage. Thanks, as always, for interesting notes |
TN Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 - surprise, it still is quitedrinkable
On Jul 13, 9:25*am, Lawrence Leichtman > wrote:
> In article > >, > > > > > > *cwdjrxyz > wrote: > > I had one bottle of Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 which I opened but > > expected to be too old. It was a decent, but not top, wine in the mid > > 80s and likely at the peak then according to some old reviews. I was > > thus not expecting much, and had another bottle of younger wine as a > > backup. The fill was still in the low neck, and the cork was still > > sound, although a bit soft. > > > The wine still is fairly deep in color with only moderate age showing > > around the rim. There is fairly intense black fruit such as cassis and > > blackberry. There is considerable mixed spice. The tannins are a bit > > dry as often is the case for old 66s, but not too intense. The acid > > balance is good. This is an old style common in Saint Emilion PP (pre- > > Parker). *Such wines often can take many years to fully develop and > > can hold a long time after they mature. They can be very good matches > > for some foods. However they often do not make friends when young. I > > do not know if anyone makes this type of wine anymore. > > What a nice surprise. Last '66 I had a Ducru from that era in 2005 was > faded though the provenance was good and the condition was good. At 40+, lots of bottle variability. '66 Ducru can still be pretty vigorous, had couple years ago. |
TN Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 - surprise, it still is quitedrinkable
On Jul 13, 9:25�am, Lawrence Leichtman > wrote:
> In article > >, > > > > > > �cwdjrxyz > wrote: > > I had one bottle of Chateau La Gaffeliere 1966 which I opened but > > expected to be too old. It was a decent, but not top, wine in the mid > > 80s and likely at the peak then according to some old reviews. I was > > thus not expecting much, and had another bottle of younger wine as a > > backup. The fill was still in the low neck, and the cork was still > > sound, although a bit soft. > > > The wine still is fairly deep in color with only moderate age showing > > around the rim. There is fairly intense black fruit such as cassis and > > blackberry. There is considerable mixed spice. The tannins are a bit > > dry as often is the case for old 66s, but not too intense. The acid > > balance is good. This is an old style common in Saint Emilion PP (pre- > > Parker). �Such wines often can take many years to fully develop and > > can hold a long time after they mature. They can be very good matches > > for some foods. However they often do not make friends when young. I > > do not know if anyone makes this type of wine anymore. > > What a nice surprise. Last '66 I had a Ducru from that era in 2005 was > faded though the provenance was good and the condition was good.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I've had a "66 Latour and a '66 Pichon Baron recently that were incredible. Both were still dark and full of fruit. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter