Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
"Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of finewine."
The following article says:
- Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine wine. Rather, the best measure judges complexity, finesse, cohesion of flavors, and an indefinable but unmistakable sense of originality. http://www.nysun.com/food-drink/beyo...-i-dont/53608/ |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
"Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine wine."
Bravo to that.
Pleasure is purely subjective, and susceptible to the 'dumbing down' effect of the inexperienced marketplace. The other qualities menioned, and possible a few more, can be evaluated more objectively by an experienced palate. On 2008-05-21 03:10:33 -0700, " > said: > The following article says: > > - Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine > wine. Rather, the best measure judges complexity, finesse, cohesion of > flavors, and an indefinable but unmistakable sense of originality. > > http://www.nysun.com/food-drink/beyo...-i-dont/53608/ |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
"Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine wine."
|
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
"Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine wine."
On 2008-05-21 09:38:47 -0700, "James Silverton"
> said: > wrote on Wed, 21 May 2008 03:10:33 -0700 (PDT): > >> - Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of >> fine wine. Rather, the best measure judges complexity, >> finesse, cohesion of flavors, and an indefinable but >> unmistakable sense of originality. > > > Don't you get pleasure from "complexity, finesse ......"? I agree - the two are intertwined - it seems the author is saying one must discount pleasure in judging a wine, and be concerned only with some barely defined metrics. One could argue for hours about the definition of "finesse", let alone something that is admited to be "undefinable but unmistakable." |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
"Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine wine."
> wrote in message
... > The following article says: > > - Hard as it may be to accept, pleasure is not the measure of fine > wine. Rather, the best measure judges complexity, finesse, cohesion of > flavors, and an indefinable but unmistakable sense of originality. > > http://www.nysun.com/food-drink/beyo...-i-dont/53608/ One of my garden design tutors said: "The best design engages the intellect as well as the senses" & I think that applies in all fields. The quote simply says that (in the wine context) in a different way. pk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Scrambled eggs... hard or "creamy"? | General Cooking | |||
Having a hard time keeping "local and seasonal" | General Cooking | |||
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs | General Cooking | |||
Hard liquor sales hit record - Ohio says "bottoms up" as economy tanks | General | |||
Problem with formula for "Hard Dinner Rolls" | Baking |